Lawyers Say DA Faked Court Date, Phony Subpoena to Seize Luigi Mangione’s Medical Files

When someone is accused of murder, the focus usually stays on the crime itself, the details of what happened, the motive, and the evidence. However, in the case of Luigi Mangione, what’s happening behind the scenes is receiving just as much attention.

His defense attorneys are accusing the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office of crossing a serious legal line, one that could affect the entire case. In a new court filing, Mangione’s lawyers claim the DA’s office broke federal law by secretly obtaining his medical records.

According to the filing, prosecutors pressured Aetna, Mangione’s health insurance provider, into handing over sensitive documents without a subpoena signed by a judge and without Mangione’s permission. That would be a violation of HIPAA, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, which protects a person’s private medical information.

The defense alleges that prosecutors went as far as faking a court date and using what they describe as a “false and fraudulent” subpoena. The document allegedly warned Aetna that it would be held in contempt of court if it didn’t comply. Aetna handed over the records.

Now, Mangione’s legal team is asking the judge to penalize the DA’s office for what they see as a serious breach. They want an evidentiary hearing, essentially a formal session in court to examine whether the DA’s office really did break the rules. They’re also considering the possibility of having the entire case dismissed if misconduct is proven.

The DA denies misconduct in the Mangione case, saying mistaken records were deleted and disclosed.

The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office has denied any wrongdoing and told Fox News it plans to address the accusations in court filings. A spokesperson for the office stated that the information request to Aetna was limited and that the insurer mistakenly sent additional documents that weren’t supposed to be released.

“We deleted the materials as soon as we became aware of them and brought it to the defense and the court’s attention,” the office said.

This legal dispute adds another layer to an already high-profile and highly charged case. Mangione is accused of killing Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, one of the biggest players in the American healthcare industry.

The shooting occurred outside the Hilton Hotel in Midtown Manhattan on December 4, 2024, just before the company’s annual investor conference.

DailyMail

Prosecutors allege that Mangione used a homemade “ghost gun,” an untraceable weapon fitted with a silencer. He allegedly shot Thompson twice at close range and then ran off. The DA’s office claims it was more than a random act of violence.

They believe Mangione was trying to send a message, calling the killing “an act of ideological terrorism.” Their argument is backed by what they say they found in Mangione’s journals and writings.

Court records reveal that he allegedly marked bullets with words like “deny,” “delay,” and “depose.” He reportedly described himself as a “revolutionary anarchist” and wrote a note to the FBI saying, “these parasites simply had it coming,” a reference, prosecutors say, to healthcare executives like Thompson.

The Influence of Legal Proceedings on Psychological Well-being

The ongoing legal proceedings can certainly take a toll on Luigi Mangione's psychological well-being. The anticipation of a possible negative outcome, such as imprisonment, can lead to heightened stress and anxiety. A study by Northwestern University has shown that such legal stressors can lead to serious mental health problems, including depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Mangione seeks to toss key evidence and terrorism charges, citing illegal searches and constitutional issues.

Mangione has pleaded not guilty. His defense attorneys are challenging not just the medical records issue but multiple pieces of evidence. They’re trying to get his statements to police thrown out and also want to suppress evidence collected from his backpack, claiming both were obtained illegally.

They’re also pushing to have terrorism-related charges dismissed, arguing that prosecuting him on similar charges in both state and federal court could violate the Constitution.

Fox News Digital

So far, the DA’s office isn’t backing down. They’ve called the case “open and shut” and insist the evidence speaks for itself.

A judge now has to decide whether the defense’s accusations about the medical records warrant a closer look. That hearing could shape how the case unfolds or even whether it moves forward at all.

Meanwhile, a separate federal case is also underway, and in that one, the government is seeking the death penalty. What started as a murder case may end up testing the limits of how far law enforcement can go to build their case and what happens when they go too far.

Moreover, the manner in which the case is being handled can also affect the trust Mangione and the public have in the legal system. Trust is a fundamental aspect of human behavior, and perceived breaches can lead to feelings of betrayal and exacerbate mental health problems. As noted by Dr. Rick Hanson, a neuropsychologist, "Trust is essential for emotional well-being; when it is compromised, it can lead to significant psychological distress." This sentiment is echoed by Dr. Shawn Achor, a positive psychology researcher, who states, "Our perception of trust in institutions directly impacts our mental health and overall happiness."

The Role of Ethical Conduct in Legal Settings

From a psychological perspective, the DA's alleged unethical conduct may also have negative implications. Breaching ethical guidelines can lead to a loss of credibility, trust, and professional reputation. Dr. Paul Bloom, a psychology professor, states, "Ethical violations not only undermine the integrity of the individuals involved but can also inflict psychological harm on those affected." This situation may indeed cause distress to Mangione, as noted on Dr. Bloom's professional website paulbloom.net.

Analysis & Alternative Approaches

In conclusion, the psychological implications of legal proceedings are multifaceted and have potential long-term impacts on the individuals involved. Maintaining ethical conduct in legal settings is not only crucial for upholding justice but also for preserving the psychological well-being of those involved. As this case unfolds, it's important to remember these psychological principles to provide a fair and balanced perspective.