Redditor's FIL Tells Her He Doesn't Care About Baby She's Expecting Because It Won't Have His Last Name

Balancing family dynamics and personal boundaries is crucial, especially when it comes to major life decisions like naming a child.

Navigating family dynamics, especially when they intersect with major life events like a pregnancy announcement, can be incredibly tricky. OP shared her story about a feud that erupted over her decision to give her baby her last name, rather than her boyfriend's family name.

This situation escalated when her father-in-law (FIL) voiced his displeasure publicly, and OP chose not to intervene in the resulting argument. This story raises questions about family expectations, respect, and the responsibilities one has in moderating social media interactions.

OP announced her pregnancy on social media three weeks ago, a momentous occasion that she expected to be filled with joy and congratulations. However, her FIL took this opportunity to express his dissatisfaction with the baby taking OP's last name, rather than his.

He commented on her post, stating that his last name "sounded much better." This sparked a response from OP's brother and a few friends, who told FIL he was being inappropriate.

The situation quickly escalated when OP's brother called FIL "stupid," leading to a heated exchange. OP chose not to intervene in the feud, believing it was not her responsibility to moderate an argument that FIL had initiated and made public.

However, her mother-in-law (MIL) felt differently. She called OP's boyfriend to complain, stating that they were tired of dealing with OP and refused to "walk on eggshells." MIL was upset that her husband had been attacked in the comments and felt that OP should have defended him.

The situation culminated in a lengthy argument between OP and MIL, during which MIL insisted that OP was in the wrong for not defending FIL. MIL accused OP of being too sensitive and suggested that she should have stuck up for FIL.

Despite no one explicitly stating that OP was upset, MIL assumed as much and criticized her for it. Following MIL's suggestion, OP called FIL to try and resolve the issue, but FIL dismissed her entirely, saying he didn't care about her or the baby anymore since it wouldn't have his last name.

Announcing Her Pregnancy and Social Media Fallout

Announcing Her Pregnancy and Social Media FalloutReddit

The Feud Escalates Beyond OP's Control

The Feud Escalates Beyond OP's  ControlReddit

Confronting FIL as Her MIL Suggested

Confronting FIL as Her MIL SuggestedReddit

OP's Perspective on FIL's Reaction

OP's Perspective on FIL's ReactionReddit

Standing Her Ground Despite Family Pressure

Standing Her Ground Despite Family PressureReddit

Clarifying Her Relationship Status

Clarifying Her Relationship StatusReddit

Future Plans and Potential Discussions

Future Plans and Potential DiscussionsReddit

The Boomers Need to Stay off The Social Media Platforms

The Boomers Need to Stay off The Social Media Platformsu/kindcrow

The Boomer Stuff Is Not Relevant And Probably Not Accurate

The Boomer Stuff Is Not Relevant And Probably Not Accurateu/doubleosepti

It's Not OP's Job To Defend Her Father In Law

It's Not OP's Job To Defend Her Father In Lawu/bamf1701

OP Is Valuing Her Good Name

OP Is Valuing Her Good Nameu/FireBallXLV

It's Probably Daily Drama With These People

It's Probably Daily Drama With These Peopleu/CariSsA504

OP's decision to stand her ground rather than apologize for not intervening in the feud demonstrates her belief in maintaining her autonomy and not capitulating to unreasonable demands.

While it might have been diplomatic to try and mediate the conflict, it is also important for OP to set boundaries and assert her own needs and decisions, especially when it comes to her child.

In conclusion, OP is not the asshole for refusing to publicly defend FIL in a feud that he initiated. The situation underscores the importance of communication, respect, and boundaries within family dynamics.

Expert Opinion

Refusing to share an inheritance may reflect personal boundaries or past family conflict. It's not always selfish - sometimes, it's about self-respect. Refusing to share an inheritance may reflect personal boundaries or past family conflict. It's not always selfish - sometimes, it's about self-respect.
Jane Cooper
Our Expert

How we reviewed this article:

We strive to provide accurate and helpful information in every story. To ensure transparency and credibility, we've referenced reputable sources that help support the context or claims made in this article.