Should I Be Concerned About How My Wife Refers to Our Kids?
AITA questions wife's phrasing when referring to kids, seeking advice if adoption plays a role, sparking debate on individuality in parenting styles.

Are you the jerk for questioning the way your wife refers to your kids? The Reddit thread is buzzing with opinions on this delicate matter.
The original poster shared his concerns about his wife's habit of separating their children in conversation, such as saying "I'm taking (son's name) and the twins to the park" instead of grouping them together as "the children." He worried that this distinction might inadvertently make their adopted son feel different or less included. However, when he brought it up to his wife, she interpreted it as an implication that she treats the kids unequally due to adoption, which wasn't his intention.
Now, he's second-guessing if he overreacted. Comments are divided, with some reassuring the OP that he may be reading too much into it, while others share personal experiences of being referred to as part of a group, like "the girls" or "the boys," without feeling excluded.
Many suggest that using phrases like "the twins" could just be a matter of convenience or habit, rather than intentional exclusion. The discussion touches on the complexities of family dynamics, individual identities, and the importance of open communication in navigating such sensitive topics.
While some feel the OP might be overthinking it, others appreciate his attentiveness to potentially fostering a sense of individuality among his children.
Original Post
My wife and I struggled with infertility for a few years and ended up adopting our first son before she got pregnant with twins through IVF. But one thing that I’ve noticed recently is how she always refers to our kids by separating them, as in “I’m taking (son’s name) and the twins to the park”, instead of “I’m taking the children to the park”, and that's something that stood out to me even though our son never said anything about it.
I don’t want to feed a possible feeling of inadequacy. I could have said the same thing if our first son was our biological child as well.
So I talked to my wife about it. We were at home, it was just the two of us.
To my surprise, she took it as if I was suggesting she treats them differently and that the adoption might have influenced her, which I know it’s not the case – we both treat them exactly the same. I was just suggesting she was careful with how she phrases this, more as a precaution.
But now I feel like I could have been an AH over something that might be nothing.
Labeling and Identity Formation
When referring to children individually or collectively, we're not just using language, we are shaping their identities. According to research by psychologists Susan Harter and Mark Bennett, how we label and refer to children can significantly impact their self-concept and identity development.
Comment from u/anglflw

Comment from u/Western-Student9622

Comment from u/ThisWillAgeWell

It's essential to note that in the context of a family where adoption is involved, the dynamics can be more complex. Studies have shown that adopted children can struggle with identity issues and feelings of belonging. This doesn't mean the wife's phrasing is necessarily harmful, but it might be worth reflecting on how it may be perceived by the child.
Comment from u/Ok_Bug_4792

Comment from u/GenoFlower

Comment from u/No_Good_Turn

Language and Inclusion
Language is a powerful tool for inclusion as well as exclusion. Research by psychologist Naomi Ellemers emphasizes the role of inclusive language in promoting a sense of belonging and reducing feelings of social exclusion. The way we group or separate individuals in our speech can subtly convey who belongs and who is 'other.'
Comment from u/Blue_wine_sloth

Comment from u/bunnylicious81

Comment from u/Feisty_Attention823

Yet, it's also crucial to remember that individual recognition is important. Psychologist Mary Ainsworth's work on attachment theory underlines the importance of acknowledging each child's unique needs and characteristics, which might be the intention behind the wife's phrasing.
Comment from u/AJSCRPT

Comment from u/Psychological-Car326

Comment from u/Lucky_Volume3819

The Power of Communication in Families
The way we communicate within families can significantly influence relationships and individual self-esteem. Research by Robert M. Milardo suggests that the language we use can shape our perceptions and interactions within the family system.
Comment from u/Extension-Ad9159

Comment from u/Leola_Root_Stew

Comment from u/lammcmahan656

The solution to this issue might not be a simple change of phrasing. Instead, open communication about these concerns can be more beneficial. Studies highlight the importance of honest, empathetic communication in resolving family issues and misunderstandings.
Comment from u/Swirlyflurry

Comment from u/BrazenDonut

Comment from u/ScarletNotThatOne

Understanding Different Parenting Styles
Parents often have different approaches to raising their children, as reflected in their language and actions. Research by psychologists Diana Baumrind and Robert E. Larzelere identifies distinct parenting styles that can have different impacts on children's development.
Comment from u/ZealousidealPay608

Comment from u/Moose-Live

What are your thoughts on this situation? Share your perspective in the comments below.
Analysis & Alternative Approaches
In conclusion, while the wife's phrasing might be unintentional or even well-meaning, it's worth having a discussion about how it might affect their adopted son. Understanding the power of language, the importance of individual recognition, and the complexity of parenting styles can help in navigating this sensitive issue. Ultimately, open, empathetic communication within the family is key to resolving such concerns (source).
Expert Opinion
This situation highlights the power of language in shaping identity and belonging. While the wife may be innocently emphasizing individuality, the phrasing could unintentionally cause feelings of exclusion for the adopted son. The best approach could be open, empathetic communication within the family about these potential impacts.
