Former White House Official Alleges Secret Underground Cities Built With Trillions In Unaccounted Government Funds

A former White House official is claiming the government didn’t just build a few extra bunkers, she says it built an entire underground world, powered by trillions of dollars that supposedly never got properly accounted for. Catherine Fitts, speaking in an interview with Tucker Carlson, alleges there are secret bases and transportation systems tucked beneath the surface, with more projects than anyone admits out loud.

The complicated part is the money and the math. Fitts points to claims of $21 trillion in unaccounted-for funds, and she ties the discussion to earlier reporting and a Michigan State University economist, Mark Skidmore, who got involved after hearing about a staggering $6.5 trillion in unsupported Army spending adjustments in fiscal year 2015. If even a fraction of that is true, it turns “national security infrastructure” into a financial mystery with real-world construction attached.

And once you hear the scale, you start wondering what else is hiding under the paperwork.

Catherine Fitts was recently interviewed by Tucker Carlson.

YouTube

“We have built an extraordinary number of underground bases and, supposedly, transportation systems,” Fitts continued. “Some of these are documented as part of the national security infrastructure. I think there are many more.”

Tucker Carlson’s reaction to all those underground bases is what really makes the whole thing feel unsettling, like he can’t unsee it now that Fitts put numbers to the rumors.

Carlson expressed concern about the scale of the supposed construction, commenting that he doesn’t see it as “a good sign” that so many bunkers may have been developed.

Fitts offered possible explanations for the purpose of the facilities, including disaster preparedness or clandestine operations.

“For example, if you’re conducting a secret space program, you need to platform it from things that can’t be seen,” she said. “But I think if you’re worried about a near-extinction event, you know.”

Her assertions about the $21 trillion in unaccounted-for funds echo findings from a 2017 report by Michigan State University economist Mark Skidmore, with whom Fitts collaborated. Skidmore became involved after hearing Fitts reference a report indicating that the U.S. Army had made $6.5 trillion in unsupported spending adjustments in fiscal year 2015 alone.

Fitts tries to connect the dots with disaster preparedness and clandestine operations, but then she brings up the idea of a secret space program, which makes the story jump tracks fast.

The Economics of Unaccounted Funds

The allegations regarding untraceable government spending raise significant questions about financial transparency.

This Kansas notice to transgender drivers, demanding immediate license surrender, echoes the same clash over identity and rules.

Reports indicate that approximately $21 trillion in government funds remain unaccounted for.

Unsplash

The conversation gets sharper when the $21 trillion claim gets tied to earlier findings, including the Army’s alleged $6.5 trillion in unsupported spending adjustments from 2015.

“Given the Army’s $122 billion budget, that meant unsupported adjustments were 54 times the spending authorized by Congress,” read a university news release at the time.

Economist Laurence Kotlikoff also weighed in during a Forbes column, writing, “The ongoing occurrence and gargantuan nature of unsupported, i.e., undocumented, U.S. federal government expenditures, as well as sources of funding for these expenditures, should be a great concern to all taxpayers.”

He added, “Taken together, these reports point to a failure to comply with basic constitutional and legislative requirements for spending and disclosure.”

Once Laurence Kotlikoff’s warning about massive undocumented expenditures shows up, the underground cities story turns into an accountability question, not just a bunker question.

The idea of secret underground cities is not just a conspiracy theory; it reflects deeper societal anxieties about safety and governance. Such fears might stem from a collective sense of uncertainty regarding leadership and societal structures.

She suggests that fostering open communication about government actions can alleviate these concerns. By engaging in community dialogues and encouraging transparency, citizens can play a role in shaping a more accountable governance model, ultimately reducing anxiety and promoting trust in public institutions.

The allegations regarding secret underground cities and the vast sums of unaccounted government funds illuminate an urgent need for transparency and accountability in governmental operations. The public's growing unease about hidden infrastructures and potential misuse of taxpayer money can only be addressed through open dialogue and active community engagement. Citizens must call for robust public accountability mechanisms to ensure that their government remains answerable. By advocating for transparency and engaging in civic discussions, individuals can play a pivotal role in fostering a more trustworthy and effective system, ultimately holding those in power responsible for their actions.

If trillions vanish into “adjustments,” nobody should feel comfortable living on top of those foundations.

Before you dismiss it, read what Mark Epstein says about Jeffrey’s final conversation.