Former White House Official Alleges Secret Underground Cities Built With Trillions In Unaccounted Government Funds

A former high-ranking government official has made explosive claims about secret U.S. infrastructure, alleging the construction of an extensive network of underground bunkers and transportation systems potentially funded by trillions of dollars in untraceable government spending.

Catherine Fitts, who served as Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Housing under President George H.W. Bush, made these claims during a recent interview with Tucker Carlson on The Tucker Carlson Show.

Over the course of their nearly two-hour conversation, the pair covered a broad spectrum of topics, from inflation and housing to global money laundering and existential threats to humanity.

Central to the discussion was a staggering claim about federal finances. According to Fitts, “$21 trillion of undocumented adjustments in the U.S. government” occurred between 1997 and 2015. She suggested that some of this allegedly missing money may have been used to construct underground infrastructure that remains largely hidden from the public.

“One thing I’ve looked at is the underground base, city infrastructure, and transportation system that’s been built,” she said.

“I’m sorry?” Carlson replied, reacting to the unexpected statement.

“We have built an extraordinary number of underground bases and, supposedly, transportation systems,” Fitts continued. “Some of these are documented as part of the national security infrastructure. I think there are many more.”

Fitts believes these hidden facilities are scattered across the U.S. and surrounding oceans. Between 2021 and 2023, she worked with a researcher to analyze available data and various allegations, ultimately estimating the existence of approximately 170 underground bases linked by a covert transportation network.

Catherine Fitts was recently interviewed by Tucker Carlson.

YouTube

“We have built an extraordinary number of underground bases and, supposedly, transportation systems,” Fitts continued. “Some of these are documented as part of the national security infrastructure. I think there are many more.”

Carlson expressed concern about the scale of the supposed construction, commenting that he doesn’t see it as “a good sign” that so many bunkers may have been developed.

Fitts offered possible explanations for the purpose of the facilities, including disaster preparedness or clandestine operations.

“For example, if you’re conducting a secret space program, you need to platform it from things that can’t be seen,” she said. “But I think if you’re worried about a near-extinction event, you know.”

Her assertions about the $21 trillion in unaccounted-for funds echo findings from a 2017 report by Michigan State University economist Mark Skidmore, with whom Fitts collaborated. Skidmore became involved after hearing Fitts reference a report indicating that the U.S. Army had made $6.5 trillion in unsupported spending adjustments in fiscal year 2015 alone.

The Economics of Unaccounted Funds

The allegations regarding untraceable government spending raise significant questions about financial transparency. Clark Howard, a consumer advocate, emphasizes that accountability is crucial, especially when taxpayers' money is at stake. He suggests that regular audits and public disclosures are vital in addressing concerns about financial mismanagement.

Howard notes that citizens must demand transparency from their government to ensure that funds are allocated responsibly. A well-informed public can advocate for better oversight, ultimately leading to more responsible fiscal policies.

Reports indicate that approximately $21 trillion in government funds remain unaccounted for.

Unsplash

“Given the Army’s $122 billion budget, that meant unsupported adjustments were 54 times the spending authorized by Congress,” read a university news release at the time.

Economist Laurence Kotlikoff also weighed in during a Forbes column, writing, “The ongoing occurrence and gargantuan nature of unsupported, i.e., undocumented, U.S. federal government expenditures, as well as sources of funding for these expenditures, should be a great concern to all taxpayers.”

He added, “Taken together, these reports point to a failure to comply with basic constitutional and legislative requirements for spending and disclosure.”

The idea of secret underground cities is not just a conspiracy theory; it reflects deeper societal anxieties about safety and governance. Dr. Susan David, a psychological researcher, explains that such fears might stem from a collective sense of uncertainty regarding leadership and societal structures.

She suggests that fostering open communication about government actions can alleviate these concerns. By engaging in community dialogues and encouraging transparency, citizens can play a role in shaping a more accountable governance model, ultimately reducing anxiety and promoting trust in public institutions.

In summary, the claims surrounding secret underground cities and untraceable funds underscore a critical need for transparency and accountability in government operations. Experts like Dr. Susan David highlight that societal anxieties can be mitigated through open dialogue and community engagement. Furthermore, financial advocates such as Clark Howard stress the importance of public accountability mechanisms. By demanding transparency and participating in civic discussions, citizens can influence governance and help build a more trustworthy and effective system.