Squid Game Creator Reveals Why He Isn’t As Rich As You’d Think Despite Netflix’s Massive Success

What does this say about the future of creativity in streaming?

When "Squid Game" premiered on Netflix in September 2021, it transformed into a cultural sensation almost overnight. The South Korean drama, with its harrowing social critique and compelling plot, became the most-watched show in Netflix history.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

In just four weeks, over 142 million households streamed the series, and it attracted 4.4 million new subscribers to the platform. Netflix reportedly earned an astounding $900 million from "Squid Game," cementing its place as a monumental success in the streaming world.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

However, the series’ creator, Hwang Dong-hyuk, faced a drastically different reality. Despite the show’s global impact, Hwang revealed he made only a modest income, raising questions about how creators are compensated in the entertainment industry.

In interviews with the BBC and The Guardian, Hwang shared his struggles, from spending over a decade trying to bring "Squid Game" to life to taking out loans to support his family. His deal with Netflix provided an upfront payment but forfeited residuals and intellectual property rights, leaving him without bonuses despite the show’s massive earnings.

Hwang’s story isn’t just about financial disparity—it’s a reminder of the challenges creators face even in their greatest successes. It also highlights the ongoing debate about fair compensation in the age of streaming platforms.

A Phenomenon with Limited Rewards

"Squid Game" was hailed as a masterpiece, blending brutal survival games with critiques of social inequality. Fans across the globe turned its characters, symbols, and games into cultural staples, from memes to Halloween costumes.

Netflix raked in enormous profits, with the show contributing significantly to its subscriber growth and cementing its reputation for innovative international content.

For Hwang, however, the financial returns didn’t match the acclaim. When Netflix acquired "Squid Game," Hwang forfeited intellectual property rights, receiving only upfront payments under his initial contract. "Even though the first series was such a huge global success, honestly, I didn’t make much," he admitted.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

This lack of residuals highlights the broader issue of how streaming services compensate creators, with Hwang pointing out that while he isn’t destitute, he’s far from sharing in the windfall Netflix enjoyed.

A Phenomenon with Limited RewardsKevin Winter/Getty Images
[ADVERTISEMENT]

Struggles and Successes Behind the Camera

Hwang’s decade-long effort to make "Squid Game" included numerous rejections, financial hardship, and even physical tolls—he lost several teeth during production due to stress. His hesitation to produce a second season stemmed from these struggles.

Still, he decided to continue the story, motivated by both a desire to complete the narrative and the need to better compensate himself for the first season's success.

Struggles and Successes Behind the CameraNetflix

The Bigger Picture

"Squid Game" not only reflects societal inequalities on screen but also off-screen, in the way creators are compensated. Hwang’s story is a reminder of the challenges behind the entertainment industry’s biggest successes. As he gears up for Season 2, audiences will eagerly watch not just the show but also the broader conversation it sparks about fairness in creative industries.

What do you think about Hwang’s story and the balance between art and profit? Comment down your thoughts or share this article for all your family and friends to see—let’s keep the conversation going!

The Business of Streaming

Dr. Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist known for his work on the impact of social media, highlights that while content creators can achieve massive success, their financial rewards often don't reflect overall profits. He notes that the streaming model favors platforms over individual creators, which sometimes leads to inequitable profit distribution.

Haidt emphasizes that understanding this model is vital for creators. He advises negotiating contracts that include profit-sharing clauses to ensure fair compensation in the evolving landscape of streaming media.

Seth Godin, a renowned marketing expert, argues that the success of shows like "Squid Game" illuminates the need for creativity over mere profitability. He suggests that creators must focus on building a unique voice rather than chasing trends. Godin states, 'In a world where everyone is shouting, the real win is to be heard.' This perspective encourages creators to invest in their brand identity.

Moreover, he advocates for understanding audience engagement as a way to enhance visibility and monetization. Building a loyal community can lead to greater financial success in the long run.

The disparity between the success of a show like "Squid Game" and the financial rewards for its creator raises critical questions about the future of creativity in streaming. Dr. Carol Dweck, a motivation researcher, emphasizes the importance of a growth mindset in navigating these challenges. She suggests that creators should focus on continuous learning and adaptation, especially in a rapidly changing industry.

By fostering resilience and embracing feedback, creators can better position themselves for future opportunities. The landscape may be tough, but with the right mindset and strategies, success can be more equitable.

More articles you might like