The Girl Pays For Disney+, But Her Roommate’s Boyfriend Treats It Like His Own
Streaming subscriptions aren’t free.
Streaming services have become a normal part of daily life, and many people enjoy watching shows and movies through platforms like Disney+, Netflix, or Hulu. However, when accounts are shared without permission, it can create tension—especially among roommates. What may seem like a harmless habit to one person can feel like an unfair burden to another.
In this case, the OP had a Disney+ account that she paid for herself. At first, it seemed like no big deal when her roommate’s boyfriend used it once or twice.
But soon, a separate profile appeared on the account, and it became clear that he was using it regularly. The situation became more frustrating when OP tried to watch something and was blocked because too many devices were already logged in.
What made matters worse was that neither the roommate nor her boyfriend contributed to the cost of the subscription. OP raised the issue casually, asking the roommate to stop her boyfriend from freeloading on the account.
Instead of understanding, the roommate brushed it off, saying it was not a big deal since OP was already paying for the service. Feeling disrespected, OP decided to change the password.
When the boyfriend could no longer log in, the roommate was upset and accused OP of being sneaky. Both she and her boyfriend acted as if OP had ruined their routine, even though they were never the ones paying for the subscription in the first place.
OP’s choice highlights a common problem: boundaries around shared living spaces and resources. While sharing can work when everyone agrees and contributes fairly, it becomes a problem when one person is left carrying the cost.
So, was OP wrong? Many would say no—after all, it was her account and her money.
Original Post
RedditOriginal Post
RedditOP’s reaction was fair. The Disney+ account belonged to her, and she was the only one paying for it. The roommate’s boyfriend had no right to use it regularly without permission, and the roommate’s dismissive attitude only made the situation worse.
Changing the password was not sneaky—it was simply a way to protect something OP pays for. While shared living arrangements often involve compromise, that does not extend to letting outsiders benefit for free.
OP set a reasonable boundary, and it is the roommate and her boyfriend who should respect it, not the other way around.
Original Post
Reddit
It’s OP's account.
Reddit
OP did nothing wrong.
Reddit
It’s very reasonable that the person who foots the bill gets priority use.
Reddit
They can buy their own account.
Reddit
They are the sneaky ones.
Reddit
They can pay for their own account.
Reddit
OP handled it just like anyone else probably would.
Reddit
OP’s roommate and her boyfriend act like everything revolves around them.
Reddit
Since it’s OP’s account, she’s free to do what she wants with it.
Reddit
The freeloading boyfriend got too comfy with other people's money.
Reddit
The obvious thing to do was to change the password.
Reddit
Psychological Analysis
This situation highlights a common issue with boundaries in shared living spaces. The roommate and her boyfriend likely felt entitled to the account because they normalized sharing, but OP's feelings of frustration stem from a sense of fairness and respect for ownership. When one person feels taken advantage of, it’s natural to assert boundaries, and OP's decision to change the password was a way to reclaim control over her resources.
Analysis generated by AI