Mom Furious As Future MIL Decides To Exclude Her Kids From Family Vacation By Saying It's For 'Adults Only'

She realized she was lied to when her future sister-in-law arrived with her three children.

A 28-year-old woman refused to just “go along” when her future mother-in-law tried to pull a fast one on her kids. The invitation sounded harmless, even flattering, until it wasn’t.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

OP and her fiancé had been trying to smooth things over with his mom, who clearly wasn’t buying her. Still, the pattern kept showing up, OP’s kids getting left out of family gatherings, and now a so-called adults-only vacation was the latest excuse.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

And when OP finally showed up, the “adults only” trip turned into a straight-up lie that blew up right in front of everyone.

The OP reveals her family situation and that she's in a relationship.

The OP reveals her family situation and that she's in a relationship.Reddit
[ADVERTISEMENT]

Her FMIL isn't too fond of her.

And although the OP's relationship with the FMIL is improving, the FMIL tends to exclude the OP's kids from gatherings.

Her FMIL isn't too fond of her.Reddit
[ADVERTISEMENT]

The OP was invited to an adults-only family trip by the FMIL.

The OP was invited to an adults-only family trip by the FMIL.Reddit

When she and her fiancé met up with the rest of the family, the OP discovered she was lied to.

It wasn't an adults-only trip.

When she and her fiancé met up with the rest of the family, the OP discovered she was lied to.Reddit

The SIL's husband told her that the FMIL must have lied so she could exclude the OP's kids.

The SIL's husband told her that the FMIL must have lied so she could exclude the OP's kids.Reddit

She didn't join the trip. It ended up in a fight with her fiancé.

She didn't join the trip. It ended up in a fight with her fiancé.Reddit

The fiancé finally reveals his true colors. This isn't looking good for the OP.

The fiancé finally reveals his true colors. This isn't looking good for the OP.Reddit

She might want to reconsider marrying this guy.

She might want to reconsider marrying this guy.Reddit

He's defending his mom even if it's clear that the FMIL is in the wrong.

He's defending his mom even if it's clear that the FMIL is in the wrong.Reddit

The FMIL should've been honest.

The FMIL should've been honest.Reddit

This guy's blaming the wrong person.

This guy's blaming the wrong person.Reddit

This will be a problem in the long run.

This will be a problem in the long run.Reddit

It wasn't about causing family drama; it was simply refusing to yield to the FMIL's manipulation.

It wasn't about causing family drama; it was simply refusing to yield to the FMIL's manipulation.Reddit

The guy needs to understand that while he doesn't have the responsibility of a dad, he has the responsibility to emotionally protect the kids.

The guy needs to understand that while he doesn't have the responsibility of a dad, he has the responsibility to emotionally protect the kids.Reddit

This situation definitely reveals the guy's red flags.

This situation definitely reveals the guy's red flags.Reddit Man and woman in tense conversation, discussing family red flags and responsibilityReddit

The fact that the guy defended his lying mom is already alarming.

The fact that the guy defended his lying mom is already alarming.Reddit

Did the fiancé even think about his mom's actions?

Did the fiancé even think about his mom's actions?Reddit

If he truly cared, he could've canceled the trip.

If he truly cared, he could've canceled the trip.Reddit

Looks like the OP's fiancé is a mama's boy.

Looks like the OP's fiancé is a mama's boy.Reddit

Time to return the ring to the fiancé.

Time to return the ring to the fiancé.Reddit

The OP should've considered the fiancé her ex the moment he defended his mom, users think.

The OP should've considered the fiancé her ex the moment he defended his mom, users think.Reddit

It’s the same kind of tension as the couple debating whether to invite in-laws on their anniversary trip.

This is the ideal scenario.

This is the ideal scenario.Reddit

The lying was intentional.

The lying was intentional.Reddit

The fiancé is siding with a liar. Yikes!

The fiancé is siding with a liar. Yikes!Reddit

In this situation, the fiancé, sadly, is an enabler.

In this situation, the fiancé, sadly, is an enabler.Reddit

Given their two-year relationship, it's only natural for people to assume that the FMIL should already be showing love and respect to the OP's kids.

Given their two-year relationship, it's only natural for people to assume that the FMIL should already be showing love and respect to the OP's kids.Reddit

Why was the guy not appalled by his lying mother?

Why was the guy not appalled by his lying mother?Reddit

The OP and her kids deserve better treatment.

The OP and her kids deserve better treatment.Reddit

Redditors don't see the situation improving. The FMIL will just repeat her actions.

Redditors don't see the situation improving. The FMIL will just repeat her actions.Reddit

At least the SIL's husband was concerned.

At least the SIL's husband was concerned.Reddit

FMIL brought inconveniences to the OP's family because of a lie.

FMIL brought inconveniences to the OP's family because of a lie.Reddit

The FMIL was the root of this drama, not the OP.

There's nothing wrong with standing up against this kind of unfair treatment.

The FMIL was the root of this drama, not the OP.Reddit

The real a-holes here are the FMIL and the OP's fiancé.

The real a-holes here are the FMIL and the OP's fiancé.Reddit

The OP and her kids will never be good enough for the FMIL.

The OP and her kids will never be good enough for the FMIL.Reddit

The fiancé should have stood up for the OP.

The fiancé should have stood up for the OP.Reddit

The situation will only improve when the fiancé and his family are out of their lives.

The situation will only improve when the fiancé and his family are out of their lives.Reddit

The FMIL is very much aware of her actions. Sadly, the fiancé doesn't consider them a problem.

The FMIL is very much aware of her actions. Sadly, the fiancé doesn't consider them a problem.Reddit Family vacation planning scene, couples arguing over excluding kids from adults-only tripReddit

The OP didn't spring her kids on the FMIL. All the FMIL needed to do was be honest about it.

The OP didn't spring her kids on the FMIL. All the FMIL needed to do was be honest about it.Reddit

Sadly, the FMIL's attitude toward the OP's children won't change.

Sadly, the FMIL's attitude toward the OP's children won't change.Reddit Stressed woman holding children’s hands, fiancé appears dismissive about girls’ inclusionReddit

The fiancé's love for the girls might be superficial.

The fiancé's love for the girls might be superficial.Reddit

The fiancé's reaction is clearly a red flag.

The fiancé's reaction is clearly a red flag.Reddit

This is disrespect, and the OP's kids don't deserve this.

This is disrespect, and the OP's kids don't deserve this.Reddit

It's a good thing that the OP stood up for her kids.

It's a good thing that the OP stood up for her kids.Reddit

If this Redditor were the OP, she would've dumped the fiancé.

If this Redditor were the OP, she would've dumped the fiancé.Reddit

This can't be considered springing the kids on the FMIL.

This can't be considered springing the kids on the FMIL.Reddit

Part of being a family is the FMIL accepting the OP's kids.

Part of being a family is the FMIL accepting the OP's kids.Reddit

If only the FMIL had allowed the kids to go with them, it would've been a good opportunity to know and bond with each other.

If only the FMIL had allowed the kids to go with them, it would've been a good opportunity to know and bond with each other.Reddit

Maybe he's just pretending to adore the girls.

Maybe he's just pretending to adore the girls.Reddit

That’s when OP realized the “adults-only” label from her future MIL was just a setup to keep her kids out of the plan.

After OP met up with the rest of the family, the SIL’s husband clocked the situation and basically confirmed, the MIL must have lied.

When OP didn’t join the trip and it turned into a fight with her fiancé, the cracks in their relationship got loud fast.

And the moment the fiancé defended his mom instead of calling out the lie, Redditors started treating his “mama’s boy” behavior like a huge red flag.

The FMIL's attitude toward the OP's kids will never change. Unless the fiancé does something about it, the little ones will always be left out.

The OP stood up for her kids, but her fiancé wasn't cooperating. Eventually, the kids will notice this kind of disrespect, causing emotional pain.

Ultimately, the decision regarding the relationship rests with the OP, and many Redditors are advising her to run away from this man and his family.

Nobody wants to marry into a family that lies, then expects you to stay quiet about it.

Want another in-law blowup about priorities? Read why she chose work over her mother-in-law’s family reunion.

More articles you might like