Iceland’s Weird Eight-Year Lawsuit Against Iceland—Over Name Rights

Iceland Foods is back in court, and this time it is not just suing a company or a rival brand. It is taking aim at the word “Iceland” itself, and the target is basically the idea of the country on a label.

Here’s the messy part: in 2019 the EU Intellectual Property Office ruled against Iceland Foods, and in 2022 that decision held up on appeal. The ruling meant Icelandic businesses could keep using “Iceland” in product descriptions and branding. The Icelandic Intellectual Property Office even warned that if Iceland Foods had won, international marketing across the EU could get complicated.

So, Richard Walker showed up again in Luxembourg, arguing that his family’s name is about a “land of ice,” not a nation.

Iceland Foods has made a new push.

In 2019, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) ruled against Iceland Foods, and in 2022, the decision was upheld in the supermarket's appeal. The ruling allowed Icelandic businesses to continue using "Iceland" in their product descriptions and branding without interference from the British supermarket chain.

According to the Icelandic Intellectual Property Office, there was concern that if Iceland Foods had succeeded in its legal efforts, Icelandic companies could potentially face restrictions when attempting to market their products internationally, particularly within the European Union.

Getty Stock Photo

The first blow landed in 2019 at the EU Intellectual Property Office, when Iceland Foods lost its chance to control “Iceland” branding.

Despite these rulings, Iceland Foods has not given up. Earlier this month, the supermarket launched a fresh appeal at the General Court of the European Union in Luxembourg, continuing its fight to maintain exclusive rights over its name within the European market.

This appeal marks the third round of legal proceedings in the ongoing battle, with Iceland Foods determined to protect its brand identity and intellectual property. Richard Walker, the executive chairman of Iceland Foods, appeared at the court in mid-October to argue the case once again.

While the case has garnered media attention for its unusual nature—pitting a supermarket chain against an entire country—Walker has emphasized the issue's importance for his business. In comments shared on social media, Walker stressed that the company's name was intended to evoke the idea of a "land of ice" rather than reference the country itself.

He has reiterated that Iceland Foods has no intention of stopping Icelandic businesses from descriptively using the name for their products. In 2022, Walker explained that his mother, Lady Walker, chose the company's name when the family business was established in the UK.

Over the decades, Iceland Foods has become a well-known brand in the UK and several other countries, including Iceland. Walker expressed disappointment at the 2022 ruling but maintained that the supermarket would continue to defend its intellectual property rights.

An appeal has been filed with the General Court of the European Union in Luxembourg.

Getty Stock Photo

After the 2022 appeal confirmed that loss, the fight did not cool off, because Richard Walker still wanted exclusive rights across the European market.

Iceland has viewed the legal victories so far as significant. The country’s foreign minister, Guðlaugur Þór Þórðarson, celebrated the rulings in 2019 and 2022, stating that it was unreasonable for a foreign company to claim exclusive rights over the name of a sovereign nation.

These decisions, he argued, were a win for Icelandic businesses, particularly those involved in exporting goods, as they ensured that they could continue using their country’s name without fear of legal consequences. The legal dispute between Iceland Foods and Iceland has attracted attention beyond just the parties involved.

The case raises broader questions about the intersection of trademarks and national identities, especially when businesses and countries share a name. As the case continues, it is expected to remain a point of contention, with potential implications for future trademark disputes involving geographical names.

This liminal vibe is similar to those glitchy, reality-bending photos that feel totally off.

The supermarket is famous for its selection of frozen foods.

Getty Stock Photo

That’s when the courtroom drama escalated again, with Walker appearing mid-October at the General Court of the European Union in Luxembourg for the third round.

Intellectual property lawyer Mark Rosenberg emphasizes the importance of understanding trademark law to avoid such conflicts.

Meanwhile, Walker kept insisting Iceland Foods has no plans to stop Icelandic businesses from using “Iceland” descriptively, even though his mother, Lady Walker, picked the name decades ago.

Ultimately, the legal process might take years to settle, but both sides are determined to stand their ground. Iceland Foods wants to protect its brand to remain strong in the market, while the country of Iceland wants its businesses to freely use their national identity in selling products.

As the case continues, it will be interesting to see how the courts balance a company’s need to protect its brand with a country’s right to use its name. No matter how it ends, this legal battle could set an example for similar disputes in the future.

The protracted legal battle between Iceland Foods and the nation of Iceland exemplifies the complicated intersection of branding, identity, and intellectual property rights. This case not only highlights the challenges of trademark disputes but also raises questions about national identity in the face of corporate branding. As Iceland Foods seeks to defend its long-standing brand, the implications for its operations and the national pride associated with the name Iceland become evident.

In order to reach a resolution, both parties may need to engage in meaningful dialogue. Utilizing mediation services could help bridge the gap between the interests of a supermarket chain and a sovereign nation. Such an approach not only fosters goodwill but also encourages innovative solutions that can honor both the brand identity of Iceland Foods and the cultural significance of the name Iceland.

If this keeps going, “Iceland” might become the most expensive word on every supermarket shelf.

Want more strange public drama? See the weird things commuters spotted on subway platforms and trains.