Vegetarian Passenger Dies After Alleged Meal Mix-Up On Long-Haul Flight

When people book long international flights, especially those with strict dietary preferences or religious restrictions, they usually trust that airlines will respect those choices. For many passengers, meals aren’t just about preference - they’re about health, belief, or both.

That’s what makes the following case so alarming: it isn’t just about a meal gone wrong, but about what can happen when protocols fail at 30,000 feet. According to a wrongful death lawsuit, 85-year-old Asoka Jayaweera, described as a “strict vegetarian,” allegedly died after choking during a Qatar Airways flight on 1 August 2023.

He had reportedly been denied the vegetarian meal he requested and was instead advised to “eat around the meat” in a non-vegetarian dish. Jayaweera, a Sri Lankan-born passenger living in California, had been traveling with his son, Surya, a cardiologist based in Southern California.

They were flying from Los Angeles to Sri Lanka, with Qatar Airways operating the long-haul leg of the journey. When booking the ticket on 23 June 2023, Jayaweera requested a vegetarian meal, a standard option among the airline’s 19 special meals. Seven of these are vegetarian, including vegan, Jain, Hindu, and lacto-ovo.

However, around two and a half hours into the flight, the cabin crew informed him that his vegetarian meal was not available. Instead, according to the lawsuit, flight attendants told him to “eat around the meat,” suggesting he consume the sides surrounding the main protein.

Passenger's oxygen levels plummet after choking incident despite in-flight emergency response.

At some point while attempting to eat the provided meal, Jayaweera began choking. The lawsuit does not clarify which specific element of the dish caused the obstruction, but it states that he struggled to breathe and required immediate assistance.

The crew reportedly initiated emergency response measures and contacted MedAire, a service that provides remote medical guidance for in-flight emergencies. Despite being given oxygen, his blood oxygen saturation fell to 69 percent, significantly below the generally safe threshold of 88 percent.

Even after continued intervention, his levels never rose beyond 85 percent, and he eventually lost consciousness around 07:30 UTC.

Unsplash

The lawsuit alleges that during this time, although the aircraft was over U.S. territory, specifically flying above Wisconsin, the cabin crew told a companion traveling with him that an emergency landing could not be made because the plane was “already over the Arctic Circle” and about to cross the ocean.

Surya’s legal team disputes this explanation, arguing that an emergency diversion to an airport in the Midwest was still possible and should have been initiated immediately once his condition worsened.

Instead, the lawsuit states that the aircraft continued flying for several more hours before eventually diverting and landing in Edinburgh, Scotland, around 11:00 UTC, approximately three and a half hours after Jayaweera had already lost consciousness.

Upon landing, he was transported to a nearby hospital but was declared dead two days later, on 3 August. Medical professionals attributed his death to aspiration pneumonia, a condition caused by inhaling food particles into the lungs, which can occur as a result of choking.

Safety Protocols and Meal Preferences

Dr. Robert Cialdini, a renowned psychologist and expert on influence, emphasizes the importance of clear communication in high-stakes environments like airlines. He points out that when dietary preferences aren't properly addressed, it can lead to dire consequences.

To improve safety, airlines should implement more rigorous training for staff on dietary restrictions and food handling. This includes a standardized protocol for confirming meal preferences, especially for passengers with severe allergies or specific diets. Educating crew members on the importance of these protocols can potentially save lives.

Lessons from Dietary Safety

Dr. Andrew Weil, an expert in integrative medicine, emphasizes that airlines must prioritize dietary safety to protect passengers with allergies or dietary restrictions. He suggests that more rigorous training for flight attendants on food service protocols could prevent serious incidents like this one. Moreover, the implementation of a clear labeling system for meals could enhance passenger safety. This would allow individuals to make informed choices while avoiding potential health risks associated with food allergies or restrictions.

Airlines need to recognize that dietary preferences often stem from health concerns, and a systematic approach could mitigate risks significantly.

Lawsuit claims Qatar Airways’ failures and negligence led to the passenger’s death on the flight.

The complaint argues that multiple failures by Qatar Airways contributed to his death: the alleged failure to provide his requested vegetarian meal, the advice to eat a non-vegetarian dish in a modified way, a mishandled in-flight response, and a delayed diversion when his condition became critical.

Legal action is being pursued under the Montreal Convention, a treaty governing international air travel and airline liability for passenger injury or death. According to the treaty, compensation for onboard deaths is typically capped at around $175,000.

However, the lawsuit is seeking damages that exceed this limit, as well as court costs, attorney fees, and pre-judgment interest, citing gross negligence and improper handling by the airline and its staff.

Unsplash

The case raises fresh concerns about how airlines respond to medical emergencies and whether dietary requests, especially those tied to health needs or strong personal beliefs, are handled with proper care.

For passengers who depend on these accommodations, it leaves unsettling questions: What happens when a mistake occurs mid-flight? Could a tragedy be avoided with better oversight and faster action?

As the lawsuit progresses, it may force airlines to examine their management of special meal preparations and medical response procedures more closely, particularly on long-haul international flights where diversion decisions can be costly and critical.

Travel safety expert, Dr. Ben Greenfield, notes that communication is critical in high-stress environments like airplanes. He argues that passengers should feel empowered to voice their dietary needs clearly. Airlines can improve their processes by allowing passengers to confirm meal choices before boarding, potentially through a mobile app or pre-flight communications. By fostering an environment where passengers can openly discuss dietary restrictions, airlines not only enhance safety but also improve customer satisfaction.

Implementing these strategies can help prevent misunderstandings and ensure that dietary preferences are respected, leading to a safer flying experience.

Analysis & Alternative Approaches

This tragic incident highlights the urgent need for airlines to reevaluate their food service protocols and ensure passenger safety, particularly for those with specific dietary needs. Experts emphasize the importance of clear communication and proper training for flight staff to prevent future occurrences. By utilizing technology to confirm dietary choices and enhancing staff awareness, airlines can create a safer environment for all passengers. Ultimately, improving these systems is not just about compliance; it's about fostering trust and ensuring a more inclusive travel experience.

In instances like this unfortunate event, it's crucial for airlines to take proactive measures. Experts in aviation safety suggest that implementing rigorous meal management systems can prevent mix-ups. For example, a dedicated verification step before meal service could ensure that passengers receive the correct dietary options.

Additionally, Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn, a physician specializing in plant-based nutrition, notes that airlines can collaborate with nutritionists to develop clear labeling and meal options. This would not only enhance passenger satisfaction but also ensure their health and safety during flights.

Therapeutic Insights & Recovery

Ultimately, this tragic incident serves as a wake-up call for airlines to refine their communication and safety protocols regarding meal services. A combination of proactive training, effective communication strategies, and collaboration with nutrition experts could significantly mitigate future risks.

With proper attention to dietary needs, airlines can foster a safer environment for passengers, ensuring that everyone feels respected and cared for at 30,000 feet. Adopting these improvements isn't just beneficial; it’s essential for the well-being of all travelers.