Researchers Claim Possible Discovery of Noah’s Ark in Turkey Using Groundbreaking Scans

“We have a shape of a ship, and then you look at the size of it… exactly 300 royal Egyptian cubits,” Jones said. “That’s what Moses wrote in the book of Genesis.”

A team of researchers believes they may have uncovered evidence of the biblical Noah’s Ark at a site in eastern Turkey. Using advanced geophysical scanning techniques, the team suggests that the Durupinar formation, a ship-shaped structure near the mountains of Ararat, could be more than just a natural rock formation.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

Andrew Jones, lead archaeological researcher for the group Noah’s Ark Scans, told NewsNation that his team has been studying the site since 2019. Originally discovered in 1959 by Turkish Army Captain Ilhan Durupinar, the site has long intrigued biblical archaeologists and skeptics alike.

[ADVERTISEMENT]
“We have a shape of a ship, and then you look at the size of it… exactly 300 royal Egyptian cubits,” Jones said. “That’s what Moses wrote in the book of Genesis.”

Many mainstream scientists argue that the formation is the result of natural geological processes. However, Jones and his team believe they have data that challenges this view. They used ground-penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography—non-invasive methods that allow researchers to "see" below the surface without excavation.

According to Jones, these scans revealed structural patterns that do not align with typical geological formations. The team claims to have identified chambers and corridor-like shapes extending up to 30 feet beneath the surface.

These features include distinct, right-angled walls and tunnel-like structures that suggest intentional design. Jones stated that these findings indicate the presence of what could be a man-made vessel buried underground.

A team of researchers believes they may have uncovered evidence of the biblical Noah’s Ark at a site in eastern Turkey

In addition to the scans, soil testing has revealed other intriguing clues. The team found that the formation contains nearly three times more organic material than the surrounding terrain. Elevated potassium levels were also detected, which the researchers interpret as potential evidence of decayed wood.

The location of the site further fuels the team's conviction. It sits in the region traditionally associated with the biblical Mountains of Ararat, which Genesis describes as the place where Noah’s Ark came to rest after the floodwaters receded.

According to Jones, the data reveals three distinct layers of material within the formation. A central tunnel appears to run through the middle, flanked by symmetrical side chambers. These features suggest architectural design rather than random geological layering.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

Despite growing attention, the claim has not been accepted by the wider scientific community. Many geologists and archaeologists continue to assert that the site’s appearance and structure are consistent with natural erosion and sedimentation processes. However, Jones remains undeterred.

He acknowledged that similar claims have been made in the past and often lacked sufficient evidence. Still, he believes the ongoing research at Durupinar may finally offer a more compelling case.

“We will continue our work until another site presents evidence that is as strong or stronger than what we are seeing here,” Jones said.

The Science Behind the Discovery

Dr. Brian Fagan, a renowned archaeologist and author of 'The Great Flood: Ancient Evidence of a Lost World,' emphasizes the importance of scientific methods in archaeological investigations. He notes that while the claims of discovering Noah's Ark are intriguing, they require rigorous peer review and corroborating evidence.

Fagan explains that using advanced geophysical scanning techniques can illuminate historical sites but also warns against jumping to conclusions without thorough analysis. He advocates for multidisciplinary collaboration, combining geology, archaeology, and biblical studies to provide a more comprehensive understanding of such claims.

The location of the site further fuels the team's conviction. It sits in the region traditionally associated with the biblical Mountains of Ararat,

The location of the site further fuels the team's conviction. It sits in the region traditionally associated with the biblical Mountains of Ararat,https://noahsarkscans.com
[ADVERTISEMENT]

“We have a shape of a ship, and then you look at the size of it… exactly 300 royal Egyptian cubits,” Jones said. “That’s what Moses wrote in the book of Genesis.”

“We have a shape of a ship, and then you look at the size of it… exactly 300 royal Egyptian cubits,” Jones said. “That’s what Moses wrote in the book of Genesis.”https://noahsarkscans.com

The debate over the historical existence of Noah’s Ark has persisted for centuries. While many interpret the Genesis story as a parable, others, like Jones and his team, argue that scientific tools are beginning to bring clarity to ancient accounts once thought to be purely symbolic.

As new technology continues to reshape how historical and religious texts are examined, the Durupinar site remains a focal point in the search for answers to one of the most enduring legends in human history.

Experts in biblical archaeology, like Dr. Robert Cargill, stress the significance of context when interpreting findings related to Noah's Ark. He highlights that while exciting, the interpretations of such discoveries can be highly subjective without substantial historical backing.

Cargill suggests that researchers should publish their methodologies and findings transparently. He also encourages academic discourse and peer review as essential steps for validating claims. This approach ensures that any assertions about the Ark's discovery are grounded in solid evidence and scholarly debate.

Behavioral Analysis & Pathways Forward

The quest for Noah's Ark continues to inspire researchers and enthusiasts alike. As experts like Dr. James Cameron suggest, while it's fascinating to explore such ancient narratives, grounding these explorations in scientific rigor is paramount.

Future discoveries should aim to integrate archaeological findings with historical and cultural analyses to fully appreciate the implications of such sites. By fostering a collaborative environment among various disciplines, the understanding of these significant historical events can be enriched, providing deeper insights into human history.

More articles you might like