Should I Share My Steam Library with In-Laws' Kid? AITA?

A 30-year-old woman just tried to keep her Steam family sharing setup simple, and it turned into a full-blown family blowup. She’s got about 2,000 games on her account, and she’s already using the shared slots for her partner, two best friends, and relatives who can’t afford games.

Then her in-laws asked for one more person to get access, her 11-year-old nephew-in-law. The complication? She doesn’t have spare slots, she’s not kicking anyone out, and she doesn’t even know the kid well. Her partner also doesn’t really get along with him, so this request feels less like “sharing” and more like a headache on demand.

And that’s when her FIL decided she was an a-hole, both in person and on social media, turning a game library into a family feud.

Original Post

I (30f) have around 2,000 games in my gaming library on Steam, 3.5 if counting Steam family sharing. For those who don't use it, Steam family sharing allows you to create a family of up to six people, including yourself, and share games with them.

If someone leaves or gets kicked out, they cannot join another family for a year, and the slot they had cannot be fulfilled for a year (I could be wrong about the last bit, though). The slots in the family have been taken by me, my partner who I live with, two of my best friends, and two family members who cannot afford games, as most games where they live are either not sold or extremely expensive.

My in-laws have recently asked if I can give my nephew-in-law (11m) access to the game library so he can play, as they can't afford the games for him. I said no.

First, I don't have space in the family and I'm not kicking anyone out. Second, I don't know him. Third, my partner doesn't really know him, and they don't get along, so why would I give someone like that access? Moreover, I am not spending hours filtering out the games the nephew can and can't play.

I have told the in-laws that. While my MIL is on my side, my FIL caused a scene and called me an a*****e for not helping (the nephew is on the FIL's side and is not really related to my partner if we get into specifics).

Both the FIL and nephew are being super dramatic about it on social media, with comments calling me an a*****e too for refusing to help a child.

The Psychology Behind Sharing

Sharing personal belongings, especially something as personal as a game library, can be fraught with emotional complexities.

Comment from u/Derwin0

Comment from u/Perfect_gff

The moment the in-laws asked to add the 11-year-old nephew-in-law, OP immediately said no because her Steam slots are already spoken for by her partner, best friends, and struggling relatives.

In considering the age of the nephew-in-law, it’s important to recognize the potential influence of video game content on young minds. This developmental stage is crucial, as young children often emulate behaviors they encounter in games, making it essential to monitor what they are exposed to during their formative years.

If the user feels uncomfortable sharing their library, it may be beneficial to establish guidelines for age-appropriate gaming. These guidelines can help ensure that the games played are not only entertaining but also suitable for the child's maturity level. Additionally, encouraging family conversations about game content could pave the way for healthier gaming habits.

This open dialogue can serve as a bridge, fostering better understanding among family members. By discussing the themes and messages within games, families can work together to create a supportive environment that promotes positive gaming experiences.

Comment from u/sc0tth

Comment from u/J-Clash

Balancing personal boundaries with family obligations is often challenging and emotionally taxing.

Comment from u/ScarletNotThatOne

Comment from u/RoyallyOakie

After OP refused, her MIL stayed on her side, but her FIL went nuclear and called her an a-hole for “not helping,” even though OP never offered to kick anyone out.

It's also worth noting that fairness plays a significant role in this situation. Studies by LoBue and DeLoache (2011) indicate that even young children have a keen sense of fairness and justice. This inherent understanding of fairness can significantly influence their behavior, leading to feelings of resentment or frustration when they perceive that they are not receiving their fair share. The user’s reluctance to share may stem from a perceived imbalance in how family resources are allocated, which can create tension in family dynamics.

To address these feelings of unfairness, the user might consider discussing the rationale behind their decision with family members. Open communication can help clarify intentions and foster a sense of understanding. Emphasizing the importance of equity in resource distribution can also promote a more harmonious environment, where everyone feels valued and respected. Ultimately, addressing these issues directly can lead to healthier relationships and a more balanced approach to sharing resources.

It’s giving the same vibe as the woman who sent back the wrong food at her boyfriend’s job, and he accused her of embarrassing him.

Comment from u/lammcmahan656

Comment from u/Voidfishie

Balancing Personal Boundaries and Family Obligations

To navigate future sharing requests, the user could implement a structured approach that not only addresses immediate concerns but also fosters a healthy gaming environment. Immediate steps could include creating a detailed list of games that are suitable for younger audiences, which would allow for a more informed discussion about sharing. This proactive measure ensures that all family members are aware of which games are appropriate, promoting thoughtful conversations. In the short term, they could initiate family meetings centered around gaming, where everyone can express their interests and preferences without feeling any pressure to conform.

Looking ahead to the longer term, the user might explore establishing a regular family game night where everyone can participate in gaming together. This not only encourages bonding but also fosters inclusivity while ensuring that the user’s boundaries regarding personal game access are respected. Such initiatives can strengthen family ties and create a shared understanding of gaming values within the household.

Comment from u/AfraidOstrich9539

Comment from u/juanredshirt

While the nephew-in-law sits on FIL’s side of the drama, OP is getting dragged online too, with strangers piling on for refusing access to her library.

The influence of social media on family dynamics cannot be ignored, as it has the potential to significantly alter relationships and communication patterns. When personal issues are discussed online, it often invites additional pressures or judgments from outside observers, which can further complicate the situation.

To mitigate these negative effects, it may be beneficial for users to limit the sharing of personal disputes on social media platforms. By keeping family matters private and within the family, individuals can help maintain harmony and reduce the potential for unnecessary drama. Ultimately, fostering open communication in private settings can lead to healthier family interactions and a more supportive environment.

Comment from u/hadMcDofordinner

Comment from u/BMal_Suj

Now the whole situation is less about whether a kid can play games and more about why OP’s family sharing arrangement got treated like a public service.</p>

What would you do in this situation? Share your opinion in the comments.

Comment from u/rocking_womble

Comment from u/Intelligent_Read_697

Comment from u/coach_Oldness-Babda

Comment from u/Zoreb1

This scenario encapsulates the intricate dynamics of family relationships, particularly when it comes to sharing personal resources.

The Steam library was supposed to be shared, but the family dinner turned into a digital war.

For another “family rules” power struggle, read what happened when he refused to cook instant noodles.