Teachers in One State Now Face ‘America First’ Exam to Prove They’re Not Too Woke
Public schools superintendent Ryan Walters announced that the test will be overseen by the conservative media organization PragerU.
Oklahoma is preparing to roll out a new requirement for aspiring teachers that has already sparked national debate. According to multiple reports, the state will mandate that applicants from California and New York pass an exam designed to ensure they are not aligned with what officials describe as "radical leftist ideology."
The move has quickly been dubbed a "MAGA loyalty test" by critics, who warn it could worsen the state’s already severe teacher shortage.
The Exam and Who Will Administer It
Oklahoma’s public schools superintendent Ryan Walters announced that the test will be overseen by the conservative media organization PragerU.
"As long as I am superintendent, Oklahoma classrooms will be safeguarded from the radical leftist ideology fostered in places like California and New York," Walters said in a statement.
The Associated Press, which reviewed the initial draft, reported that early questions include asking applicants to recall the first three words of the U.S. Constitution and to explain why freedom of religion is "important to America's identity."
USA Today added that test-takers will also be expected to demonstrate knowledge of "the biological differences between females and males."
PragerU CEO Marissa Streit told CNN that several of the exam questions are intended to focus on "undoing the damage of gender ideology."
Oklahoma is preparing to roll out a new requirement for aspiring teachers that has already sparked national debate.
PexelsWho Will Be Affected
For now, the requirement applies only to applicants from California and New York. Critics say targeting teachers from specific states raises legal and ethical concerns, while supporters argue it serves as a safeguard against what they see as ideological indoctrination in classrooms.
Moreover, such an exam could potentially foster an environment of divisiveness and hostility, as noted by organizational psychologist Dr. Adam Grant. He states, "When we categorize individuals based on their beliefs, we risk creating an 'us versus them' mentality, which can further polarize communities." This sentiment is echoed by Dr. Susan David, who emphasizes that "labeling people can lead to misunderstandings and conflict, undermining the collaborative spirit necessary for effective education."
According to multiple reports, the state will mandate that applicants from California and New York pass an exam designed to ensure they are not aligned with what officials describe as "radical leftist ideology."
PexelsPushback from Educators and Advocates
Reactions from the education community have been swift and highly critical. Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, issued a sharp warning:
"This MAGA loyalty test will be yet another turnoff for teachers in a state already struggling with a significant shortage."
Tina Ellsworth, president of the nonprofit National Council for the Social Studies, also condemned the proposal.
"State boards of education should stay true to the values and principles of the U.S. Constitution," Ellsworth said. "Imposing an ideology test to become a teacher in our great democracy is antithetical to those principles."
Oklahoma’s public schools superintendent Ryan Walters announced that the test will be overseen by the conservative media organization PragerU.
Pexels
Understanding the Psychology Behind Political Ideology Tests
Implementing a test to gauge political ideology could lead to unwarranted psychological stress among educators. The fear of being labeled as 'too radical' may inhibit teachers' ability to express their views freely, thereby affecting their mental well-being. As research from the National Institutes of Health suggests, perceived discrimination can lead to increased levels of stress and anxiety.
Walters’ Defense
Despite the backlash, Walters insists the test is necessary. In an interview with USA Today, he stated that the state Department of Education will implement the exam to ensure incoming teachers are not "indoctrinating kids."
"These reforms will reset our classrooms back to educating our children without liberal indoctrination," Walters wrote on X, formerly Twitter. "We’re proud to defend these standards, and we will continue to stand up for honest, pro-America education in every classroom."
What the Test May Include
According to USA Today, sample questions from the exam include:
What are the two parts of the U.S. Congress?
A. House of Lords and Commons
B. Courts and Senate
C. Executive and Legislative
D. Senate and House of Representatives
How many U.S. Senators are there?
A. 435
B. 110
C. 50
D. 100
Why do some states have more Representatives than others?
A. They cover a larger geographic area
B. They have held statehood for a longer period
C. The number is determined by military presence
D. Representation is determined by population size
Reactions from the education community have been swift and highly critical
Pexels
Broader Implications
The test is expected to launch soon, although no official date has been given. Supporters claim it will strengthen "pro-America education," while opponents argue it sets a dangerous precedent for politicizing teaching credentials.
With Oklahoma already grappling with a shortage of educators, critics warn that this new barrier may discourage qualified candidates from applying, especially those moving in from out of state. The controversy has positioned Oklahoma at the center of a larger national debate about education, politics, and the role of ideology in classrooms.
The Potential Impact on Education
Moreover, such an exam could potentially foster an environment of divisiveness and hostility, as noted by organizational psychologist Dr. Adam Grant. He states, "When we categorize individuals based on their beliefs, we risk creating an 'us versus them' mentality, which can further polarize communities." This sentiment is echoed by Dr. Susan David, who emphasizes that "labeling people can lead to misunderstandings and conflict, undermining the collaborative spirit necessary for effective education."
Analysis & Alternative Approaches
While it's essential to maintain a balanced political discourse in educational environments, it's equally crucial to respect individual ideologies and promote an atmosphere of inclusivity. Strategies like political litmus tests could have far-reaching psychological and educational implications, both for educators and students. It's important to turn to evidence-based research, like the studies mentioned, when making such impactful decisions.
