The Eye-Watering Cost Of Life Inside Trump’s White House Renovations

When a new president takes office, it’s common to see some changes in the White House décor. Curtains get swapped out, paintings move around, and the overall style often shifts to reflect the new occupant’s taste.

However, since Donald Trump began his second term earlier this year, the changes haven’t been subtle; they’ve been bold, expensive, and impossible to ignore. Reports of renovations started surfacing soon after January, but the full scale of what Trump has in mind only became clear over the summer.

At 79 years old, the president is showing no hesitation about leaving his personal mark on one of the most recognizable buildings in the world. In July, it was revealed that Trump intends to build an entirely new ballroom at the White House.

The project is expected to cost about $200 million, funded partly by Trump himself and partly by unnamed donors. According to his own description, the new space is designed to be both “much-needed” and “exquisite.”

It will reportedly cover 90,000 square feet and hold up to 650 guests—a size that critics argue is excessive for an already historic and heavily used residence. This ballroom announcement alone would have been enough to spark debate.

But it is only one piece of a wider effort to give the White House a makeover that leans heavily into Trump’s preference for opulence.

Trump’s Oval Office makeover swaps tradition for gold-laden showroom style.

Visitors and observers have noted that the Oval Office has undergone a dramatic transformation. Photos comparing its current state to how it looked under Joe Biden in 2022 show sharp differences. While Biden’s office was decorated in a more muted, traditional style, Trump has opted for a look that many say resembles a showroom rather than a workspace.

The walls now carry numerous portraits framed in gold, with matching gold trim along the ceiling. The fireplace has been outfitted with golden urns, and social media users quickly pointed out smaller details as well—gold-embossed coasters with Trump’s name, gilded trinkets, and decorative items scattered throughout.

One Reddit user summed up the reaction bluntly:

“It looks like they raided every Hobby Lobby within 25 miles for any gold-colored decorations they could find and hung them on the wall.”

The reaction online has ranged from amusement to disbelief, with many questioning not only the design choices but also the price tag attached to such lavish renovations.

wikimedia

Beyond the gold, Trump has also made symbolic changes that have stirred attention. In the Rose Garden, the traditional grass was ripped up and replaced with stone. In a controversial move, the official portrait of former President Barack Obama was relocated within the East Wing, making it less accessible to visitors.

While presidents have some leeway in decorating their living quarters, Trump’s changes are being seen as part of a broader attempt to reshape the White House image in his own style—something past leaders tended to approach more cautiously.

Financial Implications of White House Renovations

Financial experts often caution that extravagant spending can lead to public backlash, especially in politically sensitive contexts. Liz Weston, a financial columnist, notes that when leaders opt for ostentatious renovations, they risk alienating constituents who may prioritize fiscal responsibility over luxury.

She suggests a balanced approach, emphasizing transparency in budgeting and spending to maintain public trust. Seeking cost-effective design solutions that still reflect the president's style may garner wider approval while managing expenses effectively.

White House costs are covered by taxpayers, while the president receives a salary and allowances.

The scale of Trump’s projects has raised practical questions: What does it actually cost to live in the White House, and who covers those expenses?

For starters, the president doesn’t pay rent or utilities. The cost of maintaining the building is handled by government funds, and according to Yahoo! Finance, that figure runs anywhere from $750,000 to $1.6 million per year.

On top of that, the president receives a salary of $400,000 annually, distributed monthly, plus a $50,000 expense allowance. There’s also money allocated for travel ($100,000) and entertainment ($19,000), according to CBS News.

Getty Images

Still, not everything is covered. Groceries, toiletries, clothing, and vacations come out of the president’s own pocket. When it comes to redecorating, presidents are given $100,000 to use, but anything beyond that must be paid for privately.

Judging by the scale of Trump’s renovations, it’s safe to assume he’s dipping into his own funds—or those of his donors—to push the changes further than the standard allowance would ever cover.

Trump’s efforts reflect a desire to cement his image in American history not just through policy, but through the very walls of the White House. For others, it’s a costly vanity project that clashes with the historic character of the residence.

Whether these renovations will remain intact for future administrations or be rolled back in the years to come is still an open question.

But for now, the White House is once again at the center of public debate—not for what’s happening in its offices, but for the glimmering gold details that cover its walls.

From a psychological perspective, the renovations made in high-profile settings like the White House can signal power and authority. Dr. Brené Brown, a renowned vulnerability researcher, explains that environments significantly influence emotional states and perceptions.

She emphasizes the importance of creating spaces that foster connection rather than division. In future renovations, incorporating elements that symbolize unity and community could resonate more positively with the public, promoting a sense of shared values while also serving aesthetic purposes.

Ultimately, the choices made in high-profile renovations can reflect deeper societal values and priorities. Experts like Dr. Dan Gilbert stress the importance of emotional resonance in decision-making, particularly in leadership roles.

Future leaders might consider engaging the public in discussions about design choices to foster a sense of collective ownership and satisfaction. By prioritizing transparency and community input, they can not only enhance the aesthetic appeal of such spaces but also strengthen public trust and engagement in governance.