Vegan Refuses to Feed Live Mice to Partners Pet Snake: AITA?
AITA for refusing to feed live mice to my partner's pet snake due to my vegan beliefs, causing tension in our relationship and leading to ultimatums?
A 28-year-old woman refused to feed live mice to her partner’s pet snake, and somehow that turned into a full-on relationship standoff. The snake’s name, Slither, sounds cute on paper, but the feeding part is where her entire moral line gets crossed.
She’s been vegan for five years, and it’s not a casual “once in a while” thing, it’s her identity. Her 30-year-old partner surprised her with a snake, then asked her to handle the live-mouse meals, which she says directly violates her beliefs.
Now it’s not just about dinner time for Slither, it’s about whether love means swallowing your ethics.
Original Post
I (28F) have been a vegan for 5 years now, it's a huge part of my identity. Last month, my partner (30M) surprised me by bringing home a pet snake.
He named it Slither. Here's the issue: Snakes need to be fed live mice.
My partner asked me to feed the snake, and when I found out it had to be live mice, I was horrified. I refused, explaining it goes against my beliefs.
My partner got angry, saying I'm prioritizing animals over his happiness and the well-being of Slither. We've been arguing non-stop, and he even suggested I move out if I can't 'compromise.' So, AITA for sticking to my vegan principles and refusing to feed live mice to the pet snake?
The Clash of Beliefs
This situation highlights a major clash between personal ethics and pet care. The OP's veganism isn't just a dietary choice; it’s a deeply held belief that shapes her identity. Her partner’s decision to bring a snake into their home, with its need for live food, puts her in a moral bind. It's not just about feeding a pet; it’s about compromising her values for the sake of the relationship.
Many readers can sympathize with the OP's distress. After all, how can you reconcile feeding live mice to a snake when your core beliefs scream against it? The ultimatum from her partner adds another layer of tension, making it hard for both parties to find common ground.
Comment from u/CatLover_86

Comment from u/PizzaMonster99

Comment from u/AdventureSeeker27
That’s when her partner’s “feed the snake” request collides with her vegan identity, and the apartment basically turns into a debate club over mice.
The Pet Ownership Dilemma
This story underscores the complexities of pet ownership, particularly with animals that have specific dietary needs. Not all pets are created equal, and a snake’s reliance on live prey can feel barbaric to someone who’s committed to a vegan lifestyle. By bringing a snake into their home, the partner may have overlooked the implications for their shared life.
It raises the question of whether one partner can impose their preferences without considering the other’s beliefs. The OP’s refusal isn’t just a rejection of the act itself; it’s a stand for her principles. This makes it a compelling discussion point about how we navigate love and personal values in relationships.
Comment from u/SunnySideUp88
Comment from u/GamerGirl3000
Comment from u/TeaDrinker73
He gets mad that she won’t compromise, and suddenly her refusal is being framed as “choosing animals over him.”
It mirrors the ultimatum drama where one partner had to choose between love and their pet snake, after a bite.
When he suggests she move out if she can’t play along, the argument stops being about Slither’s needs and becomes about who gets to call the shots.
Community Reactions and Divided Opinions
The Reddit community's reaction to this post reveals just how divided opinions can be on issues of personal ethics versus relationship dynamics. Some users likely see the OP’s beliefs as non-negotiable, while others might argue that compromise is necessary for the relationship's survival. This divergence reflects broader societal debates on animal rights and the responsibilities of pet ownership.
Additionally, the partner’s ultimatum adds a stark reality to the conversation. Many readers might find it troubling that one partner feels they can dictate the terms of another's moral stance. It’s a classic relationship test, challenging the balance between love and ethical integrity.
Comment from u/Bookworm85
Comment from u/CraftyCrocheter
Comment from u/TravelBug77
And every time they argue non-stop, the live-prey question hangs over the relationship like a second, darker pet.</p>
Why This Story Resonates
This story resonates with readers not just because of the unique conflict but due to the emotional stakes involved. It’s a relatable scenario for anyone who’s faced a moral dilemma in a relationship. Whether you’re vegan, vegetarian, or a meat-eater, the underlying issue of navigating personal beliefs within the context of love is universal.
Moreover, the specifics—like the partner’s choice to surprise the OP with a pet that requires live feeding—make it all the more compelling. It raises interesting questions about responsibility and understanding in relationships. How far should one go to accommodate their partner's choices, especially when it clashes with deeply held beliefs?
Comment from u/MidnightSnacker
How would you handle this situation? Let us know in the comments.
Where Things Stand
The conflict between the OP's vegan beliefs and her partner's pet ownership choices highlights the delicate balance many couples must navigate between love and personal ethics. It prompts us to consider what compromises are acceptable in relationships and whether some values should remain untouchable. As readers reflect on this scenario, it begs the question: How would you handle a similar situation where your values are at odds with a loved one's choices?
He might be happier in a different home, because she’s not feeding live mice just to keep the peace.
Wait, it gets worse, see what happened when she rehomed her girlfriend’s surprise python.