Thousands of Women Join Instagram's #FilterDrop Challenge to Fight Against Retouched Beauty Ads
Fed-up Instagram influencers are banding together to advocate for stricter guidelines on how beauty products are advertised online.
Beauty ads on Instagram can look polished to the point of being unreal, and that is exactly why the #FilterDrop campaign caught so much attention. As more people noticed how often filters and retouching were being used to sell tanning and makeup products, the backlash started to build.
Makeup artist Sasha Louise Pallari launched the campaign to encourage women to post natural photos and push for clearer rules around beauty advertising. After complaints to the UK Advertising Standards Authority, several ads were ruled misleading, and the response quickly turned into a bigger conversation about honesty online.
Now the campaign has gone far beyond one complaint, and the pressure on filtered beauty ads is only growing.
1. The ASA discovered that the tanning brand 'Skinny Tan' had used an in-app filter to enhance influencer Elly Norris's tanned look for their ad campaign.
mssoerensen12.
beautifulbybreakfast3.
instagram
4.
whatmummadidnext
5. Sasha filed complaints with the ASA about the two ads, later hearing the news that it had been ruled that using filters in these cases was a breach of the CAP Code rules.
bbcwest
The first ruling gave the campaign real momentum.
6. “We understood that the filter 'Perfect Tan' by Bianca Petry resulted in a significantly darker skin tone. The filter’s effects were therefore directly relevant to the intended effects of the product,” the ASA stated regarding the 'Perfect Tan' case.
elevateskin
7.
glamityjane
8. According to the ASA's assessment, “The ads breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading Advertising) and 3.11 (Exaggeration).”
sashalouisepallari
9.
annacamaleon
10.
faean
11.
charlottejonsie
12. An order was issued for the ads to be deleted, with the ASA stating, “The ads must not appear again in the form complained about. We told Skinny Tan and Ms. Norris not to apply beauty filters to photos that promoted beauty products if such filters were likely to exaggerate the effect the product was capable of achieving.”
cheshona
That decision made the influencer world pay attention.
13.
mimandskin
14. “Hi guys, I wanted to tell you all about how I’ve been tanning my face recently using these Tanologist face and body drops,” Cinzia said in a clearly airbrushed video.
helenazelenika
15.
zoe_agnew_
16. The ASA is cracking down hard on the influencer market, which is renowned for using misleading filters to promote beauty products.
beautifulbybreakfast
And the next case showed this was not a one-off.
17.
beautifulbybreakfast
18.
beautifulbybreakfast
19. The ASA added, “Because the ads conveyed a tanning effect of the product, we considered that the application of the filter 'Perfect Tan' by Bianca Petry to the images was directly relevant to the claimed performance of the product and gave a misleading impression about the performance capabilities of the product.”
beautifulbybreakfast
20. Here's to seeing many more beautiful, natural faces online in the future!
saigetaylor
21. A similar case involved an ad campaign for 'Tanologist Tan,' which was shared by influencer Cinzia Baylis-Zullo.
izzierodgers
22.
life.of.lisa.w
Filtered beauty ads are having a harder time hiding now.
Want another social-media ethics mess, see why this woman asked whether to use her sister’s pregnancy announcement.