Nonprofit Founder Considers Resigning Because of Toxic New President Who Disregards Policies, Denies Raises, and Leaves Their Entire Team Feeling Undervalued

The question is: will they be an a-hole for doing so?

Sophia

Published in Interesting
12 Oct 2023

Nonprofit Founder Considers Resigning Because of Toxic New President Who Disregards Policies, Denies Raises, and Leaves Their Entire Team Feeling Undervalued

In a world where good intentions clash with toxic power plays, OP, the founder of a flourishing nonprofit, faces a daunting decision. A new president, "Tiffany," has swept in, disregarding policies, denying raises, and leaving the dedicated team feeling undervalued.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

Despite OP's attempts to uphold organizational standards, Tiffany's ruthless approach prevails, shattering the harmony once cherished within the organization.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

Amidst this turmoil, OP grapples with a moral dilemma: does resigning make them the villain or the hero?

The heart of the issue lies in a board that seems blind to the distress of its team, dismissing requests for fair treatment and ignoring the founder's pleas for change. The team, once passionate about their mission, now stands at a crossroads, contemplating departure if OP chooses to step away.

The struggle to balance dedication to the cause and the need for self-respect weighs heavily on OP. As the deadline for resignation approaches, the tension mounts. Will OP stay and endure the storm, hoping for change?

Or will they take a stand, potentially triggering a mass exodus, all in the name of preserving their integrity and the well-being of their devoted team? The stakes are high, and the fate of the nonprofit hangs in the balance.

Just take a look at the original post...

OP, a founder of a 5-year-old nonprofit who raised $250k for the community, is torn between resigning and risking their team's departure or staying in a role where rehiring is uncertain.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

Newly elected president Tiffany has disregarded rules, displayed toxic behavior, and assumed an authoritarian stance within the organization over the past year.

[ADVERTISEMENT]

Efforts to address Tiffany's disrespectful behavior yielded no response or resolution from the organization's leadership for several months.

Understanding Toxic Leadership

Dr. Olivia White, a leadership expert, discusses the detrimental effects of toxic leadership on organizational culture.

Her research indicates that leaders who disregard employee welfare can create a climate of fear and resentment, leading to high turnover and low morale.

Organizations with toxic leadership often see a decline in productivity and overall employee satisfaction.

The team proposed hour reallocation, overdue raises, and Tiffany's removal as president to the board, receiving a noncommittal promise of a follow-up.

The team's requests were denied after a month, and Tiffany was reelected as president. The board is now accepting applications for the executive position, including the author's.

OP was told they wouldn't be fired since it might take over six months to define a new job, post it, and hire someone. The new hire would also shape their own team, as the board hadn't specified the role yet.

According to studies published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior, toxic leadership is linked to increased stress among employees, leading to burnout and disengagement.

Recognizing these patterns is crucial for organizations seeking to improve workplace culture.

The team is heartbroken and feels undervalued and unappreciated under Tiffany's leadership, leading to a sense of being pushed out.

OP is considering resigning with a two-week notice to avoid potentially being pushed out, but worries about the impact on their team. They question if this makes them appear inconsiderate.

Update from OP: their team's mass resignation left only four volunteers, casting doubt on the board's ability to rebound from this setback.

Scroll down to see what people had to say!

The Importance of Healthy Work Environments

Creating a healthy work environment is essential for employee well-being and productivity.

Research shows that organizations prioritizing employee welfare see significant improvements in morale and retention rates.

Fostering open communication and support can alleviate many issues associated with toxic leadership.

By departing on their terms, they can preserve their dignity, especially when they know the organization is likely to terminate them.

Consult with an employment lawyer to navigate the complexities of various choices and ensure the best outcome.

If they're stalling, the individual shouldn't wait—loyalty goes both ways.

To combat toxic leadership, organizations should implement training programs that promote positive leadership styles.

Encouraging leaders to develop emotional intelligence and empathy can transform workplace culture.

Studies support that organizations with emotionally intelligent leaders experience higher employee satisfaction and performance.

It's wise for them and their team to make a clean break from "Tiffany's" dubious leadership.

None of the backstory changes the fact that leaving a job is a personal choice and doesn't make someone an AH.

As the founder of the nonprofit, they have the potential to establish a superior organization where they call the shots and realize their vision.

Resign, take the team, and line up a new job, leaving a parting message: "Good luck finding a replacement in this job market for this toxic environment!"

They should create a better nonprofit elsewhere and leave their current organization in the dust.

It's not uncommon to see boards overstep when they believe they know better than the staff.

They should utilize their remaining time to establish a new charity and seize the opportunity for a fresh start.

If they're not serious about reconsideration, there's no obligation to act in the organization's best interest.

Tiffany's secrets or connections are steering the ship toward disaster, so it's time to bail without notice.

If they founded the organization, they should be the captain of their own ship, not relinquishing control to someone with a different course in mind.

This mismanagement will sink their ship, while their team can still sail on and do good work.

Nonprofit problems often boil down to troublesome boards, and this extreme case is sadly not unique. Before taking action, a legal consultation might expose a remedy for Tiffany's bylaw acrobatics.

Founding the organization without self-protection in the bylaws was a miss. Life's too short for never-ending battles; it's time to embrace a new season.

Lead the exodus; they'll learn that treating staff poorly has consequences.

They should exit without giving notice and take their entire team with them—sometimes, silence speaks louder than words.

This is just corporate downsizing in disguise; it's time companies stopped treating workers like dirt.

Polish the resume, explore new options, and stay ready to exit with unemployment as a parachute, all while giving them the "no good reason" departure.

In nonprofit management, when the board's steering towards a shipwreck, jumping overboard on one's terms is the smart move.

If the organization doesn't value them and their team, it's time for them to resign and let the organization lie in the bed they've made.

In the realm of nonprofits, where the heart meets hurdles, OP's story stands as a testament to resilience. As they face the daunting decision ahead, the world watches, waiting to see if this tale ends in a triumphant turnaround or a daring new beginning.

Comment down your thoughts, or share this article for all your family and friends to see!

Psychological Analysis

This situation highlights the significant impact of leadership style on employee well-being.
It's essential for organizations to recognize the importance of fostering supportive leadership to ensure a healthy workplace.

Analysis generated by AI

Analysis & Alternative Approaches

Addressing toxic leadership is crucial for creating a positive organizational culture.

As research shows, prioritizing employee welfare leads to improved morale and productivity.

OP, a founder of a 5-year-old nonprofit who raised $250k for the community, is torn between resigning and risking their team's departure or staying in a role where rehiring is uncertain.

Newly elected president Tiffany has disregarded rules, displayed toxic behavior, and assumed an authoritarian stance within the organization over the past year.

Efforts to address Tiffany's disrespectful behavior yielded no response or resolution from the organization's leadership for several months.

Understanding Toxic Leadership

The team proposed hour reallocation, overdue raises, and Tiffany's removal as president to the board, receiving a noncommittal promise of a follow-up.

The team's requests were denied after a month, and Tiffany was reelected as president. The board is now accepting applications for the executive position, including the author's.

OP was told they wouldn't be fired since it might take over six months to define a new job, post it, and hire someone. The new hire would also shape their own team, as the board hadn't specified the role yet.

The team is heartbroken and feels undervalued and unappreciated under Tiffany's leadership, leading to a sense of being pushed out.

OP is considering resigning with a two-week notice to avoid potentially being pushed out, but worries about the impact on their team. They question if this makes them appear inconsiderate.

Update from OP: their team's mass resignation left only four volunteers, casting doubt on the board's ability to rebound from this setback.

The Importance of Healthy Work Environments

By departing on their terms, they can preserve their dignity, especially when they know the organization is likely to terminate them.

Consult with an employment lawyer to navigate the complexities of various choices and ensure the best outcome.

If they're stalling, the individual shouldn't wait—loyalty goes both ways.

It's wise for them and their team to make a clean break from "Tiffany's" dubious leadership.

None of the backstory changes the fact that leaving a job is a personal choice and doesn't make someone an AH.

As the founder of the nonprofit, they have the potential to establish a superior organization where they call the shots and realize their vision.

Resign, take the team, and line up a new job, leaving a parting message: "Good luck finding a replacement in this job market for this toxic environment!"

They should create a better nonprofit elsewhere and leave their current organization in the dust.

It's not uncommon to see boards overstep when they believe they know better than the staff.

They should utilize their remaining time to establish a new charity and seize the opportunity for a fresh start.

If they're not serious about reconsideration, there's no obligation to act in the organization's best interest.

Tiffany's secrets or connections are steering the ship toward disaster, so it's time to bail without notice.

If they founded the organization, they should be the captain of their own ship, not relinquishing control to someone with a different course in mind.

This mismanagement will sink their ship, while their team can still sail on and do good work.

Nonprofit problems often boil down to troublesome boards, and this extreme case is sadly not unique. Before taking action, a legal consultation might expose a remedy for Tiffany's bylaw acrobatics.

Founding the organization without self-protection in the bylaws was a miss. Life's too short for never-ending battles; it's time to embrace a new season.

Lead the exodus; they'll learn that treating staff poorly has consequences.

They should exit without giving notice and take their entire team with them—sometimes, silence speaks louder than words.

This is just corporate downsizing in disguise; it's time companies stopped treating workers like dirt.

Polish the resume, explore new options, and stay ready to exit with unemployment as a parachute, all while giving them the "no good reason" departure.

In nonprofit management, when the board's steering towards a shipwreck, jumping overboard on one's terms is the smart move.

If the organization doesn't value them and their team, it's time for them to resign and let the organization lie in the bed they've made.

Psychological Analysis

Analysis & Alternative Approaches

More articles you might like